I have talked repeatedly about “mass-energy”, most often in the context of “concentrations of mass-energy”, for more than a decade. When doing so, I have assumed every time that energy within a given volume has the same gravitational effect as the equivalent mass within the same given volume.
For example, the gravitational effect of the Sun on the
Earth would be precisely the same if mass of the Sun were expressed in mass
(kg) or energy (J).
Now you might immediately question this, because the Sun is
radiating huge amounts of energy every second, 3.86×1026J, and this implies that it would
therefore be losing mass at rate of m=E/c2=4.29×109kg
per second. This seems like crazy talk,
until you look at what the experts at Stanford say: “that the Sun loses mass 4.289×1012g
every second to energy”.
This makes me a little more confident in my assumption.
---
Of course, it’s not simply the case that the Sun has a
certain amount of energy just sitting there when it’s not escaping at the rate
mentioned above. A continual process of fusion is generating that energy, from mass. However, it should be noted that, while it
takes eight minutes for energy (in the form of a photon) to reach the Earth
from the Sun, it takes that energy 100,000 years to bubble up from the
core to the surface. This implies that
there is 60×60×24×365.24×100,000×3.86×1026J=1.22×1039J
worth of energy in the process of bubbling up to the surface of the Sun from the
core, equivalent to 1.35×1020kg, which might sound like a lot but is a very small fraction of the entire
mass (about 0.15 billionths).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment, but play nicely!
Sadly, the unremitting attention of a spambot means you may have to verify your humanity.