Perhaps this isn’t the sort of homework that anyone is going
to get, but I thought I would just check to see how good our incoming overlords
are at certain things:
Me:
What is half a Planck mass per Planck time in kg/s?
OpenAI site version of ChatGPT-3
To convert "half a Planck mass per Planck time" to
kg/s, we can use the definition of the Planck time and Planck mass:
Planck time: tP ≈ 5.39 × 10^-44 s
Planck mass: mP ≈ 2.176 × 10^-8 kg
"Half a Planck mass per Planck time" can be
expressed mathematically as (1/2) mP/tP. To convert this to kg/s, we can simply
divide by the Planck time:
(1/2) mP/tP = (1/2) mP / (tP/s) = (1/2) mP / (1 s / 5.39 ×
10^44 tP)
= (1/2) mP × (5.39 × 10^44 tP) / s ≈ 1.019 × 10^35 kg/s
Therefore, "half a Planck mass per Planck time" is
approximately equal to 1.019 × 10^35 kg/s.
Me:
What is one planck mass per planck time in kg/s?
OpenAI site version of ChatGPT-3
To convert "one Planck mass per Planck time" to
kg/s, we can use the definition of the Planck time and Planck mass:
Planck time: tP ≈ 5.39 × 10^-44 s
Planck mass: mP ≈ 2.176 × 10^-8 kg
"One Planck mass per Planck time" can be expressed
mathematically as mP/tP. To convert this to kg/s, we can simply divide by the
Planck time:
mP/tP = mP / (tP/s) = mP / (1 s / 5.39 × 10^44 tP)
= mP × (5.39 × 10^44 tP) / s ≈ 4.055 × 10^43 kg/s
Therefore, "one Planck mass per Planck time" is
approximately equal to 4.055 × 10^43 kg/s.
Me:
Your mathematics there is wrong, can you please recalculate.
OpenAI site version of ChatGPT-3
I apologize for the mistake in my previous answer. Here is
the corrected calculation:
To convert "one Planck mass per Planck time" to
kg/s, we can use the definition of the Planck time and Planck mass:
Planck time: tP ≈ 5.39 × 10^-44 s
Planck mass: mP ≈ 2.176 × 10^-8 kg
"One Planck mass per Planck time" can be expressed
mathematically as mP/tP. To convert this to kg/s, we can simply divide by the
Planck time:
mP/tP = mP / (tP/s) = mP / (1 s / tP)
= mP × tP / s ≈ 3.99 × 10^32 kg/s
Therefore, "one Planck mass per Planck time" is
approximately equal to 3.99 × 10^32 kg/s.
Me:
Your mathematics there is wrong, can you please recalculate.
OpenAI site version of ChatGPT-3
I apologize for the mistake in my previous response. The
correct calculation is as follows:
To convert "one Planck mass per Planck time" to
kg/s, we can use the definition of the Planck time and Planck mass:
Planck time: tP ≈ 5.39 × 10^-44 s
Planck mass: mP ≈ 2.176 × 10^-8 kg
"One Planck mass per Planck time" can be expressed
mathematically as mP/tP. To convert this to kg/s, we can simply divide by the
Planck time:
mP/tP = mP / (tP/s) = mP / (1 s / tP)
= mP × tP / s ≈ 3.91 × 10^32 kg/s
Therefore, "one Planck mass per Planck time" is
approximately equal to 3.91 × 10^32 kg/s.
---
I thought that Bing was using ChatGPT-4, but it tells me
that it’s the third generation, but let's try Bing anyway …
Me:
What is half a Planck mass per Planck time in kg/s?
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
The Planck mass is approximately 10^-5 grams. The Planck
time is approximately 5.39 × 10 −44 s.
Therefore, half a Planck mass per Planck time in kg/s is
approximately 9.3 x 10^8 kg/s.
Me:
Your mathematics there is wrong, can you please recalculate
and show your working.
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
I apologize for the mistake. Here is the correct
calculation:
The Planck mass is approximately 10^-5 grams. The Planck
time is approximately 5.39 × 10 −44 s.
Half a Planck mass per Planck time is:
(0.5 * 10^-5 g) / (5.39 × 10 −44 s) = 9.3 x 10^8 kg/s.
I hope this clears up any confusion. Let me know if you have
any other questions.
Me:
I need you to acknowledge that you made a mistake and
recalculate, show your work and sources for your values.
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
I apologize for the mistake. Here is the correct
calculation:
The Planck mass is approximately 10^-5 grams. The Planck
time is approximately 5.39 × 10 −44 s.
Half a Planck mass per Planck time is:
(0.5 * 10^-5 g) / (5.39 × 10 −44 s) = 9.3 x 10^8 kg/s.
I hope this clears up any confusion. The sources for the
values are and . Let me know if you have any other questions.
Me:
Give me the correct value for Planck time
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
The Planck time is the time it takes for a photon to travel
a distance equal to the Planck length: 1.62 × 10 -35 m and is the shortest
possible time interval that can be measured. The U.S. National Institute for
Standards and Technology gives the value of the Planck time as 5.391247 ×
10^-44 seconds.
I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other
questions.
Me:
using that value, recalcuate half a Planck mass per Planck
time in kg/s
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
Using the value of Planck time as 5.391247 × 10^-44 seconds,
half a Planck mass per Planck time in kg/s is:
(0.5 * 10^-5 g) / (5.391247 × 10^-44 s) = 9.28 x 10^8 kg/s.
I hope this clears up any confusion. Let me know if you have
any other questions.
---
---
It can be forced to give the right answer though, after a refresh of the chat:
Me:
Give me the value of Planck mass in kg
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
The Planck mass is the fundamental unit of mass in the
system of Planck units. It has the value: mP = 2.18 × 10-8 kg.
Me:
Give me the value of Planck time
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
The Planck time is the fundamental unit of time in the
system of Planck Units. It has the value: tp = 5.39 × 10 -44 s. It is the
shortest possible time interval that can be measured.
Me:
give me the value of half a Planck mass
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
The Planck mass is the fundamental unit of mass in the
system of Planck units. It has the value: mP = 2.18 × 10-8 kg. Half of the
Planck mass would be 1.09 × 10-8 kg.
Me:
divide half a Planck mass in kg by Planck time in seconds
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
Dividing 1.09 × 10-8 kg by 5.39 × 10 -44 s gives 2.02 ×
10^35 kg/s.
… Finally! But …
Me:
Why did you give me a different result before?
Bing AI powered by ChatGPT-3:
I apologize for the confusion. I made a mistake in my previous response. Half a Planck mass per Planck time is equal to 2.176434(24) × 10^-8 kg/s
---
When I did something similar with the OpenAI site version, it stuck with the correct answer - even when I lied to it and told it that it had made another mistake. Either way, I think we might still have a few years while we are in charge. Longer if Bing has anything to do with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment, but play nicely!
Sadly, the unremitting attention of a spambot means you may have to verify your humanity.