Here’s an interesting quotation from WLC:
I think non-believers are
absolutely obligated to take the Lord’s Supper and to tithe and so forth mainly
because they are morally obligated to become Christians and so to do the things
that God commands Christians to do.
This is scary stuff for anyone who is opposed to the idea of
a theocracy. I guess it won’t register as
such for anyone who is a christian, but imagine the righteous furore from the
favourite websites of islamophobes around the world (and those of the alt-right,
the slightly more right-wing outlets such as Daily Stormer) if the scenario
were slightly different. Imagine an imam
blithely saying something similar about how non-muslims are “absolutely
obligated” to fall in line with islamic traditions and so on because everyone
is “morally obligated to become Muslim and do what Allah commands”.
I wondered if the context made the comment more benign than
it appears. Here's that context (from a Reasonable Faith podcast):
KEVIN HARRIS: <snip>
Skipping down to the last paragraph, Howe argued that there is a difference
between biblical morality and a broader morality — though for Christians,
observing the Lord’s Supper is important, non-believers are not obligated to
follow such rituals.
DR. CRAIG: I disagree with that!
KEVIN HARRIS: Really?
DR. CRAIG: I think non-believers
are absolutely obligated to take the Lord’s Supper and to tithe and so forth
mainly because they are morally obligated to become Christians and so to do the
things that God commands Christians to do. They are disobedient in refusing to
worship and submit to God as he calls us to do. It is not as though they are
exempt from these moral duties and that these are laid solely upon Christians.
These are moral duties that every human being has as a creature of God – to
worship God with all your heart, and soul, and mind, and strength, and so to
carry out the obligations that God puts upon worshipers.
KEVIN HARRIS: Chase that just a
little bit, Bill. We often hear from our atheist friends, skeptical writers,
that faith doesn’t have a moral component to it. Faith in God – whether you
believe in God or not – is not a moral thing. It is just a difference of
opinion or something like that.
DR. CRAIG: I think that is
profoundly wrong. I think that we have a moral obligation to believe in God.
The first and greatest commandment that I just quoted is that we worship God
with our whole being. Atheists are fundamentally in rebellion against God and
are doing something that is deeply immoral that separates them from God and
leaves them under his condemnation and wrath.
KEVIN HARRIS: Another thing that
I would look at, if he is going to talk about what biblical morality is, what
Christians would do to be moral and what a non-Christian would do (and you
would disagree with that rightly), it brings up the issue suppose you
encountered someone who was engaged in homosexual behavior. The temptation it
seems in what we see today (particularly from Christians) is how they ought not
do that, how it is wrong, how the Bible says it is wrong when if that person is
not a Christian they are going to say I’m not going to follow your Bible. From
that standpoint, telling them what Romans says or what Leviticus says would
just fall on deaf ears. You are putting your biblical morality on me. In a
sense they would be right, wouldn’t they? The issue is – your sexuality aside
for a moment – what is your relationship with God? What is your relationship to
Christ? That is what we should go to rather than be side-tracked on what a
person is doing.
DR. CRAIG: I think that is true
as evangelistic strategy that we ought to win people to Christ so that their
lives would be transformed by Christ so that they can then avoid temptation and
avoid sin rather than requiring them to reform their lives first and then come
to Christ. But nevertheless, the truth is that insofar as they do these things
as non-Christians they definitely are sinning. They are in rebellion against
God. One has only to read the first chapter of Paul’s letter to the Romans to
realize that there is a whole litany of behaviors that are rampant among
non-Christians which are noxious to God. Paul says those who do such
things deserve to die. They fall under God’s retributive justice and are justly
condemned for doing those things. Of course, you and I are in there with them
in that mass of sin. But one has fled to Christ for mercy and grace and pardon
and cleansing. That is what the non-believer needs to do, too.
KEVIN HARRIS: Come as you are and
then let God take care of all these things.
DR. CRAIG:Yes.
Nope, not any better in context. Not at all. WLC is implying here is
that people disobeying Paul deserve to die, unless they have “fled to Christ”. And this could easily be interpreted as “if
you’re not a christian, you deserve to die”. It's lucky that we don't
have violent, fundamentalist christians out there ready to put WLC's and Paul's
words into action, isn't it?
And yes, I do notice that WLC prefaces all of his multisyllabic
statements with an indicator of opinion (“I disagree”, “I think”), but I think
this is no more than an intellectual fig-leaf.
But I guess that’s just my opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment, but play nicely!
Sadly, the unremitting attention of a spambot means you may have to verify your humanity.