Here’s a simple question, although getting to the question is quite so simple.
---
There is a radius associated with a non-rotating, spherical
black hole, called the Schwarzschild radius, which can be shown to be the
radius at which light, travelling in a vacuum, cannot escape. This is given by rS=2GMS/c2,
where G is the gravitational constant, MS is the mass
of the (Schwarzschild) black hole and c is the speed of light. There is, therefore, a radius to mass ratio such
that MS = rS.c2/2G.
Such a black hole, by definition is spherical, and the
volume of it can be given by VS = 4/3.πrS3.
This gives us the opportunity to calculate the density of a Schwarzschild
black hole – given by
ρS = MS/VS = 3.c2/(8π.G.rS2)
Interestingly, the density of a Schwarzschild black hole,
therefore, is inversely proportional to the square of its radius (and also to
the square of its mass, because the mass and radius are directly proportional). The larger and more massive a black hole is,
the less dense it is. Note that the gravitational time dilation equation is:
Note that a critical value of r, at which this equation
becomes tdilated = 0, is r=2GM/c2.
You could wonder, then, what the density of an enormous
black hole would be. Let’s say one with
a radius of 13.77 billion light years (the distance that light could have
travelled in the time since the beginning of the universe, assuming flat space
and something with uniform rectilinear motion that it was travelling relative
to). 13.77 billion light years is equal to 13.03x1026 m. So, we have:
rS = 1.303x1026
m
c = 299792458 m/s
G = 6.6743x10-11 m3/kg/s2
π = 3.14159 (-ish)
Plugging these in,
we get a density of 9.47x10-27 kg/m3 – or 9.47x10-24
g/m3 – or 9.47x10-30 g/cm3. This is precisely the critical density of the
universe (that should be of little surprise, since ρc = 3H2/(8π.G), where H is the Hubble parameter, which happens to be the inverse of
the age of the universe, so in our equations above H = 1/(age of the universe) =
c/rS).
So: my simple
question is this, why is it that the density of our universe is pretty much
precisely (within the bounds of experimental uncertainty) the density of a Schwarzschild
black hole that is precisely the size that a universe would be after 13.77
billion years, if it expanded at the speed of light?
---
A slightly more
complicated question is as follows.
Noting that, for
any volume with a radius rS, the density of that volume is
critical when ρS is given by ρS =
3.c2/(8π.G.rS2) – and the “criticality” thus only gets
worse when the radius is greater, how can it be that the (observable) universe
is 46.508 billion light years in radius and, according to WMAP measurements,
9.9x10-27 kg/m3 in density, when a Schwarzschild black
hole of that radius would have a density of 8.3x10-28 kg/m3
(or about 1/12 of what we have)?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment, but play nicely!
Sadly, the unremitting attention of a spambot means you may have to verify your humanity.