Say that you
wanted to indulge in a little reactive wankery and create for yourself a little
motto in Latin in response to someone’s quote from Thomas Aquinas. Say that you went, as one often does, to
Google and looked for a Latin to English translator. Say that you were surprised to see that
Google has its own little translator.
You’d be
impressed, right?
However,
there are some interesting bugs. I know
that Latin is pretty precise, so that when you have the right declensions and
whatnot, you’ll know precisely what is being done by who to whom and why. English, however, is a little less
precise. So I typed in my potential
motto and checked out the result.
However, I know that errors can creep in so I reverse translated it to
see what I got, then I did it again and again until I reached linguistic equilibrium (where back translation resulted in no change):
·
English – A wise man knows that god does not
exist
·
Latin – Vir sapiens , scit non est deus
·
English – A wise man , knows that there is no
God
·
Latin – Vir sapiens , scit quod non est Deus
·
English – A wise man , knows that is not God
·
Latin – Vir sapiens , scit quod non est Deus,
·
English – A wise man , knows that I is not God,
·
Latin – Vir sapiens , scit quod non est Deus,
True enough,
I suppose. A wise man knows that I am
not god, even if he (the wise man) doesn’t know me.
To be
honest, I really did want a slightly more wankery-rich motto (and one that was
less sexist), so let’s look at what that turns out to be:
·
English – When all truth is known and all that
is known is truth, the wise shall know that there is no god
·
Latin – Cum omne quod cognoscitur , cognoscitur
et verum est verum, quia non est Deus sapiens
·
English – When all that is known is known and
the truth is the truth , because God is not a wise
·
Latin – Cum omne quod verum est , et cognoscit ,
quia Deus non est sapiens
·
English – Since everything which is true, and
knows , because God is not wise
·
Latin – Cum omne quod est verum, et quia Deus
est sapiens
·
English – When everything that is true , and as
God is a wise man
·
Latin – Cum, quod verum est, quod , cum Deus sit
sapiens
·
English – When the Lord, that the truth of it
is, that , since God is the wise man
·
Latin – Cum de Domino, quod verum est, quod ,
cum Deus sit sapiens
·
English – In the case of the Lord, as it is
true, that, since God is the wise man
·
Latin – In casu , ut dictum est, quod , cum Deus
sit sapiens
·
English – In that case, as has been said , that,
since God is the wise man
·
Latin – Quo in casu, ut dictum est , quod , cum
Deus sit sapiens
·
English – In this case, as has been said , that,
since God is the wise man
·
Latin – In hoc casu, ut dictum est , quod , cum
Deus sit sapiens
·
English – In this case, as has been said , that,
since God is the wise man
·
Latin – In hoc casu, ut dictum est , quod , cum Deus sit sapiens
What the
…? We go from saying that there is no
god to saying that god is a wise man?
Is this a
problem with Latin or Google? Let’s
see. I’ll do the same with Swedish
(since I can do that manually anyway, so I can keep an eye on what it is
doing):
·
English – A wise man knows that god does not
exist
·
Swedish – En vis man vet att gud inte existerar
·
English – A wise man knows that God does not exist
And:
·
English – When all truth is known and all that
is known is truth, the wise shall know that there is no god
·
Swedish – När all sanning är känd och allt som
är känt är sanning , skall den vise vet att det finns ingen gud
·
English – When all truth is known and all that
is known is the truth, the wise man knows that there is no god
·
Swedish – När all sanning är känd och allt som
är känt är sanningen , vet den vise mannen att det inte finns någon gud
·
English – When all truth is known and all that is known is the truth,
the wise man knows that there is no god
Ok, one was
pretty much perfect (the capitalisation of “god” doesn’t really matter) and some
sexism crept in via the English in the other, but they are both essentially
correct. Why the dog’s breakfast with
Latin?
Swedish and
English are both from the same root languages (via the Angles and Saxons) so
perhaps we could try a completely different one? I happen to know a bit of Thai also, note
that while Thai does borrow some Sanskrit and Pali words, via its Buddhist
heritage, the majority of common words are of Austric origin.
·
English – A wise man knows that god does not
exist
·
Thai – คนฉลาด
รู้ว่า พระเจ้า ไม่ได้อยู่
·
English – A wise man knows that God does not exist
And:
·
English – When all truth is known and all that
is known is truth, the wise shall know that there is no god
·
Thai – เมื่อ
ความจริง ทั้งหมด เป็นที่รู้จักกัน และสิ่งที่ เป็นที่รู้จักกัน เป็น ความจริง คนที่ฉลาดจะ รู้ว่า ไม่มีพระเจ้าอื่นใด
·
English – When the truth is known and what is
known is the fact that intelligent people will realize that there is no God .
·
Thai – เมื่อ
ความจริง เป็นที่รู้จักกัน และสิ่งที่ เป็นที่รู้จักกัน เป็นความจริงที่ คนฉลาด จะรู้ว่า ไม่มีพระเจ้า
·
English – When the truth is known and what is
known . It is true that the wise man knows no God .
·
Thai – เมื่อ
ความจริง เป็นที่รู้จักกัน และสิ่งที่ เป็นที่รู้จักกัน มันเป็นความจริง ที่ คนฉลาดรู้ว่า ไม่มี พระเจ้า
·
English – When the truth is known and what is known . It is true that
the wise man knows no God
Now with the
more wankery-rich motto Google clearly struggles due to the lack of punctuation
in Thai, so a human might need to get in there to change a word or two to tie
the concept of truth back to what is known (delete มัน and the space before มัน, and possibly replace
the last ที่ with ก็),
but it’s not the complete cock-up observed with Latin.
So why does
this happen with Latin? My suspicion,
and it’s only a suspicion, is that Latin has been used for in the rough order
of two thousand years to discuss god related stuff and there are biases in its
use that prevent complex phrases which convey that god does not exist. Note that this does not stop very simple
phrases from expressing the concept, or is there:
·
English – There is no god
·
Latin – Non est deus
·
English – There is
·
Latin – est
·
English – The
·
Latin – est
What? Ok, how about this:
·
English – god does not exist
·
Latin – deus non est,
·
English – God does not exist ,
·
Latin – Deus non est ,
·
English – God is not ,
·
Latin – Deus autem non est ,
·
English – He is not God,
·
Latin – Et non est Deus ,
·
English – And there is no God ,
·
Latin – Et non est ultra Deus ,
·
English – And there is no God ,
For some
reason it wants to add in the “et”. Let’s
look what happens when we take that out:
·
Latin – Non est ultra Deus
·
English – There is no God
·
Latin – Non est Deus,
·
English – There is no God ,
·
Latin – Non est Deus ,
·
English – There is no God ,
Take out the
comma and remove the capitalisation of “deus” and we are soon back to a string
that ends up flipping between “the” and “est”.
The lesson
on this, apparently, is that if an athiest wants a motto that is full to the
brim with wankery, he or she should stick with Swedish or Thai and avoid Latin
altogether.
Or not rely
on Google.
---
ไม่ได้ชักว่าวในขณะที่เด็กกำลังรับชม
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment, but play nicely!
Sadly, the unremitting attention of a spambot means you may have to verify your humanity.