tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post5523868280882970942..comments2024-02-15T19:40:29.872-08:00Comments on neopolitan's philosophical blog: A History of Lyingneopolitanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02501854905476808648noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post-27958793528830663252013-04-27T02:37:03.483-07:002013-04-27T02:37:03.483-07:00There's also something uniquely satisfying in ...There's also something uniquely satisfying in knowing that there are only two options:<br /><br />1. Craig is lying deliberately through his more recent declarations that the majority of historians agree. And if he is lying, you have to ask yourself why does Craig have to lie? or<br /><br />2. Over the period of just 20 years, Craig's story has morphed without his being consciously aware of it, despite the fact that he makes his speeches available and they can be viewed on youtube (or listened to if you can't bear looking at his smug face, but the smug is still there in the voice). Imagine what this superpower of reality morphing could do to the story of your preferred messiah after he got unexpectedly crucified and you were wandering around the desert for a couple of decades with only iron age technology. This option surely puts a hole in the whole reliability of the gospels argument, which puts the average Christian back to option 1.<br /><br />Lying for Christ, gotta love it :)neopolitanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02501854905476808648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post-65270684166295173472013-04-26T08:56:46.768-07:002013-04-26T08:56:46.768-07:00Every time I read what WLC has to say, I always th...Every time I read what WLC has to say, I always think that there are only 2 possibilities, he's either stupid or a liar. My opinion is that he is a liar, and this post is a good argument toward that conclusion.Hausdorffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01690401058367596952noreply@blogger.com