tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post1152661513422435794..comments2024-02-15T19:40:29.872-08:00Comments on neopolitan's philosophical blog: A Non-Circular Definition of Moralityneopolitanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02501854905476808648noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post-13093111045641256832016-07-24T19:07:50.903-07:002016-07-24T19:07:50.903-07:00Thank you for your interest and comment but I thin...Thank you for your interest and comment but I think you have misunderstood the intent and context of this article. I must accept some responsibility for that since the links to earlier articles were broken. I've fixed that now and you can go take a look at "<a href="http://neophilosophical.blogspot.com/2013/02/morally-circular-definitions.html" rel="nofollow">Morally Circular Definitions</a>" at your leisure.neopolitanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02501854905476808648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5944248932558389199.post-36125962590649623262016-07-22T22:28:17.203-07:002016-07-22T22:28:17.203-07:00What is this trash? I should have stopped reading ...What is this trash? I should have stopped reading when you put "reddit" and "philosophy" closer than 3 words apart. This article does nothing to address the truly hard problem of the circular nature of morality. Your comparison of the morality of killing to stealing is ignorant and short sighted. Also legality is not a core issue relevant to the problem. This article is not insightful, helpful, nor thought provoking.Timnoreply@blogger.com